GenAI Is Not A Defense — Civil And Criminal

restriction operative 2 legal instruments

Utah removed "the AI did it" as a defense in both civil and criminal contexts. A principal who uses, prompts, or acts through generative AI remains liable for the resulting statement or act. The criminal rule (§76-2-107, SB 149, effective 2024-05-01) and the civil mirror together eliminate the doctrine across Utah consumer-protection and criminal law. The civil rule was first enacted at §13-2-12(2) (SB 149, effective 2024-05-01) and re-sited at §13-75-102 (SB 226, effective 2025-05-07).

Codification bridge (selected sources)

The October 15, 2026 bridge checks the selected current civil locator and its §13-2-102 cross-reference against the retained Chapter 77 code and 2026 enrolled SB 38 §§3-4, 163-164. The Summary retains the historical enrolled numbering. The criminal, principal, foreseeability and third-party assertions were not re-reviewed by this bridge; their existing qualifications and unknowns remain. No underlying violation is established merely by AI use, and no human verification date is renewed.

What Counts

What Does Not Count

Associated records (including proposals)

Legal InstrumentScopeStatusMapping entries
Utah SB 149 (2024) — Artificial Intelligence Amendmentsus-utenforcing1
Utah SB 226 (2025) — Artificial Intelligence Consumer Protection Amendmentsus-utenforcing1