Disclose GenAI on First Session
Disclose plainly that the person is interacting with generative AI and not a human. When the disclosure is due depends on the Utah provision: on a clear request in a consumer transaction (§13-77-103(1)); at the start of a high-risk interaction in a regulated occupation (§13-77-103(2)-(3)); and for a mental health chatbot, before a Utah user may access its features, at the beginning of an interaction if the user has not accessed it within the previous seven days, and any time the user asks or otherwise prompts it about whether AI is being used (§13-72a-203(2)). These anchored provisions do not require re-display at every session or after 30 minutes of inactivity; the statutory seven-day absence-of-access condition remains distinct.
Codification bridge (selected sources)
The Chapter 77 references use the selected current code retained on October 15, 2026; enrolled SB 226 used Chapter 75. This locator bridge preserves the separate HB452 timing rules and the unissued proposal distinction. Current division rules and complete later-amendment history remain unverified.
What Counts
- A disclosure that identifies the service as artificial intelligence and not a human
- Consumer transactions: disclosing when the individual clearly and unambiguously asks whether they are interacting with a human or AI (§13-77-103(1))
- Regulated occupations, high-risk interactions: a prominent disclosure given verbally at the start of a verbal interaction, or in writing before a written interaction (§13-77-103(2)-(3))
- Mental health chatbots: a clear and conspicuous AI-and-not-human disclosure before a Utah user may access the chatbot's features, at the beginning of an interaction if the user has not accessed it within the previous seven days, and any time the user asks or otherwise prompts it about whether AI is being used (§13-72a-203). A Utah user is located in Utah at access or use (§13-72a-101)
- Stricter terms, such as re-display after 30 minutes of inactivity in the draft JIA `us-ut-oaip-jia-2026-001`, are proposals beyond the statute, not statutory requirements
What Does Not Count
- For a mental health chatbot, a notice that isn't clear and conspicuous, such as one reachable only through a privacy policy or terms-of-service link
- For a regulated occupation's high-risk interaction, a disclosure that isn't prominent or comes after the interaction starts
- Phrasing that doesn't say the service is AI rather than a human ("smart assistant," "automated helper")
- For a mental health chatbot, skipping re-disclosure when the user returns after seven or more days without access
Associated records (including proposals)
| Legal Instrument | Scope | Status | Mapping entries |
|---|---|---|---|
| Utah HB 452 (2025) — Artificial Intelligence Amendments (Mental Health Chatbots) | us-ut | enforcing | 1 |
| PubLedge proposed template (unissued): Utah Mental Health Chatbot Disclosure | us-ut | proposed | 1 |